Fracking in America

A relatively new development in energy production, fracking for natural gas has offered an alternative to the traditional fossil fuels that are infamous for extreme pollution. However, fracking has not proved to be the environment-saving hybrid that it was marketed as.  While natural gas is better for the environment then coal, the actual process of fracking destroys areas of land, contributes significantly to global warming, and pollutes water supply.  Phil Radford argues in his article that fracking for natural gas only provides a "bridge" and a tool for procrastination, an excuse for not developing permanent alternative and safe options.  This article speaks to the majority of Americans, even referencing polls of Americans on the topic that provide insight on the issue.  The text serves as a medium for the masses to express their ideas with the author channeling the most popular opinions.  The major argument is that not enough is being done to research and move to a new energy source that would actually benefit Americans and the environment, which is what the public is calling for.  Using outside sources in his argument aids to provide a stronger argument because he establishes his point as a popular one and a credible stance.  The author also calls people to action by stating that the more people that speak out, the closer America will be to clean energy production.

Link to Article